Deliberation does not reduce the gap between citizens’ and legislators’ ethical preferences

This week, I had the opportunity to talk on the Nuffield Politics Seminar about my current project on citizens’s preferences on Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) and how they differ from what lawmakers decided. The feedback I got was amazing, though not always practical (“If you could go back in time and vary about 10 experimental conditions …”.

Here are the slides:

Related posts:

Breitbart expanding to France and Germany? Sports Cars, Sleaze and Gamma Rays: Rhineland-Palatinate Elects Its FirstRed-Green Government ECPR Joint Sessions 2013 have a Facebook Fanpage