Sep 292008
 

In a recent article in the European Journal of Political Research, Kestilä and Söderlund claim (amongst other things) that in the French regional elections of 2004, turnout and district magnitude have significant negative effects on the extreme right vote whereas the effects of the number of party lists and unemployment are positive and significant. Most interestingly, immigration (which is usually a very good predictor for the radical right vote) had no effect on the success of the Front National. More generally, they argue that a subnational approach can control for a wider range of factors and provide more reliable results than cross-national analyses (now the most common approach to this phenomenon). My colleague Liz Carter and I disagreed and engaged in a massive replication/re-analysis endeavour. The outcome is a critique of the KS model of subnational political opportunity structures in regional elections. In this paper, we dispute Kestilä’s and Söderlund’s claims on theoretical, conceptual and methodological grounds and demonstrate that their findings are spurious. Today, the European Journal has accepted the article for publication (probably in 2009) 🙂

Technorati-Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  2 Responses to “Does Immigration help or hurt the Front National in France?”

  1. […] Read Kai Arzheimer’s post and both papers here. […]

  2. Interesting paper! Certainly served as a reminder to me of keeping a critical eye also to what appears to be a thorough empirical basis for a paper.

Agree? Disagree? Leave a reply (also works with Facebook, G+, Twitter...)

%d bloggers like this: